Annie Brook does not wish to take in any more bad publicity because she is concern for the health of her baby boy ‘Nong Teekayu’. As for whether or not she will sue her former boyfriend “Maetee”, Annie revealed her women’s group (‘Puen Ying Society) is in the process of taking care of her legal matters.
Tomorrow Annie will attend her first public appearance at an event.
“I want to focus all my attention to my son because right now he is 3 and a half months already. He is starting to take in more information and I’m afraid if I keep taking in all of this bad publicity it will have an impact on my son. Before I was taking in too much news and I was too occupied with the news and my son felt like I wasn’t giving him too much attention. He started to cry more so I don’t want to take in anymore news. I don’t want my son to feel bad”
Are you going to sue Maetee or anybody else whom have jeopardized your reputation?
“Right now the elders are taking care of this for me and they have asked me not to discuss this so I would like to keep this quiet. As for whom I plan to sue, I will leave this for the Executive members of the women’s group to decide. They will however consult me about it too but right now I can’t tell you anything”
Annie also clarified a rumour that claimed she had lost 5 million baht on a presenter job for a milk company due to her bad publicity. On this subject, Annie claimed she had been contacted for the job, however there have been no discussions on the details of the job and she had not accepted the offer. It was purely just talk so therefore the rumour claiming that she had been pulled out from the job is not true as she hasn’t even accepted the job yet.
However Annie confessed, personally she wishes to gain more work so she will have enough money to raise her son. Right now “A” is helping her to find work.
So Celebrity manager “A” Supachai is your back up?
Annie was hesitant to answer the question, she simply said;
“I have a senior who is helping me to find work. I don’t want to reveal the name of this person”
Annie revealed tomorrow she will appear at Golden Dome at 12 noon for an event.
Source via Komchadluek
Film wants his mother to accompany him to Korea
Yesterday “Film” Rattapoom Tohkongsub and his mother arrived at the Legal Execution Department via a Taxi. The actor still appeared to be in ill health as him and his mother sauntered to the Bankruptcy Division to request permission for her to leave the country to accompany Film on a trip to Korea.
Previously Film’s parents have been declared bankrupt many years ago and according to the law – they may not travel overseas without legal permission.
Film’s mother specified on her paper work to the Bankruptcy office that her reason to accompany her son to Korea is due to his ill health and he will need to be taken care of while spending time overseas.
The Bankruptcy Division permitted Film’s mom to travel to Korea with her son on the condition that her trip cannot exceed 15 days.
Meanwhile women of Lumpang are still protesting to demand a public apology from Hea Hoh. If the CEO of RS Promotion will not come forward with an apology by the 10th October, the women of Lumpang will travel to Bangkok to continue their protest outside RS Promotion Head Office.
Source via Thairath
Film, Maetee, Poj – Forgiven!
Recently Annie Brook has updated her Blackberry status to “Forgiven”, Siambunterng magazine suspected the actress is referring to “Film” Rattapoom and the many men whom have mistreated her.
Siambunterng also reported that the reason why Film has chosen to go to Korea is because his tour company had previously set up a tour group to Korea for Asia Song Festival as Film was scheduled to perform there. However, eventhough he has been replaced by “Bie” Sukrit Wisetkaew, Film plans to go to Korea anyway to watch the performance as an audience along with his tour group.
Film will return to Thailand on the 24th October 2010.
Minister of Social Development Slams Maetee for exposing Annie Brook
On the 8th October, Mr Isara Somchai, Minister of Social Development talked to Khaosod News about the incident where Maetee held a press conference in regards to Annie Brook.
“Whether Annie is good or bad she is still a female and a human being with dignity. If you are not involved in this case then even the court will not listen to you. It’s been 10 years and I feel this is not any of Maetee’s business. What is his purpose of coming out? Whether the information is true or not he shouldn’t have said it”
“In the past how did he manage to get involve with her and fall in love with her, what he did was very unmanly, a real gentleman would not have done it”
Isara revealed he is not on Annie’s side but since she has stopped speaking then everyone else should too. The minister also praised Film for keeping quiet. Since Film is no longer speaking and Annie is not asking for Film to take responsibility then this should stop. There is no reason for the personal business between 2 people to become a big deal.
The minister is however suspicious as to how all of these new characters are stepping forward – what is their purpose to attack a woman and expose embarrassing details about her past? Isara asked the public to please be considerate to a woman who has no means of fighting back.
Woman’s Society says it’s about the inequity between men & women, they are not interested in whether or not Annie is good or bad
Mr Jadet Chaowilai, Manager of ‘Puen Ying Women’s Society’ also talked about Maetee’s press conference – as the former boyfriend had mentioned the women’s society in his speech. Mr Jadet revealed;
“Puen Ying Women’s Society has been around for 30 years. Annie is not the first woman to receive help from us because we have helped so many other women who have been mistreated in so many ways. We help people from the poorer status to middle class status. Therefore we don’t need to consider whether or not we are being used by anyone. All we look at is whether or not this woman has been mistreated”
Jadet revealed in Annie’s case, it is apparent that Annie is not being treated as equally to men. Society are judging her claiming that women whom are involved in a relationship with more than one man is bad but they are not judging men whom are involved in a relationship with many women.
We are not looking at whether or not Annie is good or bad. We are looking at the inequality between men and women.
“Some people are trying to say they will accept the child once there’s a paternity test but for us we don’t feel it’s necessary. It is Annie’s right to make this decision and she is clear about her intention of not wanting anyone to be the father of her child”
“Annie has come to realize the inequity between men and women. Society is branding her to be a bad woman and I would like to ask society to not have such double standard. People should not jeopardize women by revealing information about their personal matters. People need to consider protecting the rights of the child. This is very important, people need to stop coming out and think about the child”
“In this case, people need to stop talking about other people’s past. People need to move forward and use Annie’s case as a learning tool. There are so many cases like this in society and we need to offer support for the future. A child with one parent, whether a child is raised by a single mother or single father, we need to worry about how to raise this child so he will grow up with dignity and not missing out on anything. The more we criticize about this topic, then what will become of this child? The best thing to do is to stop”
Asking for a DNA test is not that simple says Court of Justice
On the same day, Mr Sithisak Wanachakit, spokesman for the Court of Justice advised the need for a paternity test. A DNA test should be done to rule out whether or not baby Teekayu is the biological son of Film Rattapoom. As for the legal aspect of whether or not this can be enforced in the house of law, Mr Sithisak revealed it cannot be if only one parent is requesting for it.
The only time a DNA test can be enforced is the case where both parties have consented to the test. However, if one is resisting the test for an irrational reason then the court will rule out that the reason for rejecting the paternity test is due to whatever the argument is, such as, if the male party asks for paternity test to rule out biological link between him and the child and the mother refuses without a rational reason. Then the court will rule out that this child is not the biological son of the male party.
The spokesperson for the court of justice also revealed that paternity test is one mean of proof in the case, however other evidence can be used in court to fight the case as well. But as you can see the law has very high respect for human’s right to protect their body. No one can force DNA testing without consent. Therefore getting paternity test through the legal system is not as easy as people say. Everything needs to be done according to the law.
Source via Khaosod